Blog #1
By Ryley Chong
When we look at the history of New Religious Movements there
are several that are better known than others. Two of the most notable New
Religious Movements is the PeoplesTemple and Synanon. So question becomes, what makes these New Religious
Movements so special, iconic and a little more memorable than the rest? The
answer can be broken down into three different parts. Both Synanon and the
Peoples Temple had iconic leaders, a transition/change in beliefs over time and
have both come to an end.
The Peoples Temple originated in
the Midwest in the 1950s. In the 1960s, the Peoples Temple would move to Northern
California, first to Mendocino County, near Ukiah and later in the 1970s south
to San Francisco. In the late 1970s the Peoples Temple would move again, for
the last time to South America. Lead by the leader, Reverend Jim Jones, the
Peoples Temple had a diverse following with people from all racial backgrounds.
Jim Jones is best described as a
charismatic, well liked, and very personable leader. These characteristics of
Jim Jones attracted many followers to his Temple. The Peoples Temple’s racially
diverse following viewed Jim Jones as a person who could change their lives.
Many felt that the Peoples Temple was the best thing that had ever happened in
their lives. The people believed that Jim Jones had special healing powers and
that he could literally perform miracles.
Over time Jim Jones became a well-respected
public figure. Jim Jones was recognized and well liked by the media. As his
influence grew, he would become involved in politics. As an influential public figure,
Jim Jones was appointed by San Francisco Mayor at the time, George Moscone to
be the chairman of the San Francisco housing authority commission.
In 1958 Charles Dederich founded Synanon in Santa Monica, California. Charles Dederich a
recovering alcoholic, inspired by the work of Alcoholics Anonymous decided to
create Synanon as place for addicts to recover and to later rejoin society.
Impressed with the Alcoholics Anonymous tactics, Charles Dederich decided to
employ similar techniques in Synanon, and created the recovery method called “the
game.” This method of recovery was considered a form of group therapy but to
some degree the verbal and mental abuse was harmful to the individual. Overall,
Charles Dederich was a leader who loved organization and control.
Synanon’s original intent to
rehabilitate individuals and return them back to society fully sober. But, as
time passed Synanon would become much more than a place of recovery and shifted
to a religious cult with Charles Dederich as its fearless leader. Establishing
itself as a religion meant that Synanon could retain more membership and
receive a tax exemption. As a result, Synanon distanced itself from the rest of
the world and preparing its own armed military forces. Synanon would become
associated with crime and with help from the media, Synanon became a problem in
society.
When we analyze the characteristics
of the leaders of Synanon and the Peoples Temple it is not difficult to see the
similarities. In the beginning each leader had the charismatic nature to earn
the approval of the community. Both Jim Jones and Charles Dederich were very
influential individuals. The characteristics of both these leaders attracted a
large following of people who seemed to be searching for someone to guide them
in the right direction. These followers felt that these leaders could provide them
with the guidance that they needed in their lives. Both leaders seemed to empower
their large groups of followers by providing them with a clearly defined organizational
structure to where individuals felt in control of their lives. The nature of
both Jim Jones and Charles Dederich made them well liked by everyone.
At the beginning, both Synanon and
the Peoples Temple seemed to have good intentions. Both organizations received
support from the government and had a favorable relationship with the media and
politicians. However, it seems that as time passed both Jim Jones and Charles
Dederich became obsessed with preserving their organization and would do
anything to maintain control over their people. Both Jim Jones and Charles
Dederich made their followers feel as if they were dependent on their leaders
to survive. In the end, both leaders would do whatever it took to maintain
their reputation and image, Jim Jones would even die for this cause.
Towards the end, Jim Jones and
Charles Dederich seemed to believe that the world and especially the government
were out to get them. Both became obsessively paranoid with the outside world. With
a deteriorating relationship with the media and a growing negative public
perception of their religious movement, Synanon and the Peoples Temple would
start to acquire weapons and their own military forces. In an effort to
maintain control both leaders took violent approaches and worked to demonstrate
authority. Feeling as if all of their hard work was going to turn to nothing
just because of the negative public perception from the media both leaders took
action in what can only be described as extreme.
In the end, both leaders seemed to
have their own agendas. For Charles Dederich this meant creating his own holy
war and military to separate Synanon from the outside world. Both Synanon and
the Peoples Temple would establish borders and restrict access from outsiders. For
Jim Jones, this meant causing the largest mass suicide, in what should be
considered as killings and not a voluntary act.
Work Cited
History.com Staff. (2010). Jonestown. Retrieved April 05,
2016, from http://www.history.com/topics/jonestown
Morantz, P. (2009). The History of Synanon and Charles
Dederich. Retrieved April 05, 2016, from
http://www.paulmorantz.com/cult/the-history-of-synanon-and-charles-dederich/
Van Gelder, L. (1997, March 4). Charles Dederich, 83,
Synanon Founder, Dies. Retrieved April 5, 2016, from
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/03/04/us/charles-dederich-83-synanon-founder-dies.html
Comment on Riley Chong's Post: You do a wonderful job looking at the similarities and in doing so you point out some significant differences that does also show contrast which helps strengthen your opinion by showing how credible your thoughts and research are. Similarly you do a great job not just focusing on the leaders but the organizations as a whole, which is solid because it is analyzing more than just one topic. I think it was awesome how you discussed how the leaders led to their downfall of their own cult, and how you showed that both started out as something special, different, and amazing but was lead to its demise via one main person. I enjoyed reading about each of the leaders and I noticed that each of them had quite the power trip at one point and this lead to their paranoia, but when we look at it the reason they were paranoid is because they wanted their, religion/cult to keep going and to stay alive. Also great job on adding in the in text links without having the URL present and having a works cited too. The only thing I that I think you could improve on is adding in your voice and opinion, the information you have is amazing and really reflects your hard work done using research, but your opinion would be helpful and then perhaps giving reason or evidence as to why you stated your opinion would make this blog entry perfect.
ReplyDeleteI believe that the leaders paranoia is one of the leading factors for the collapse of both NRMs. The media attention pushed the leaders into an even deeper state of paranoia. I believe that Jim Jones and Charles Dederich handled the paranoia in similar ways. First, both moved into areas to avoid the attention. Second, Synanon became violent and the Peoples Temple would end in tragedy.
Delete